As the political terrain in Nasarawa State begins to take shape ahead of the 2027 governorship election, it is increasingly clear that the era of zoning, long treated as an unwritten gentleman’s agreement—may have finally run its course.
For years, zoning served as a delicate balancing mechanism among the state’s three senatorial districts. While never enshrined in law, it carried political weight and moral authority.
It was used to distribute power, promote inclusion, and reduce the political anxiety of marginalization. But that unspoken pact appears to have lost its influence.
Today, no fewer than 31 governorship aspirants from all corners of the state, across multiple political parties, have openly declared interest in the race for the "White House" on Shendam Road.
The sheer number of contenders—many of them respected and seasoned,demonstrates that the state has moved beyond sectional expectations. Whether this shift was by design or default, it marks a critical point in Nasarawa’s democratic journey.
This development is not necessarily a setback. On the contrary, it offers an opportunity to reset the political culture, one where leadership is earned through competence, vision, and public trust, rather than birth location.
A merit-based contest can inspire excellence, energize the electorate, and deepen democratic participation.
However, the fading of zoning must not be misinterpreted as the end of political fairness. True inclusion must still be pursued.
The aspiration for equity should now find expression in the platforms and policies of those who seek to govern, not in restrictive rotation formulas but in actionable plans that speak to every region’s needs.
The political class must be reminded that unity and justice are not automatically guaranteed in an open race.
The absence of zoning must not become an excuse for dominion by the politically privileged.
All aspirants must be evaluated not on where they come from, but on what they stand for and what they are capable of delivering.
As the campaign season approaches, political parties must also rise to the occasion. Candidate selection should reflect broad acceptability, not narrow interests.
This is the time to demonstrate leadership and foresight by promoting aspirants who can unify, not divide; who can serve, not rule.
Nasarawa stands at a turning point. The zoning debate may have ended, but a new chapter begins, one that must be written with fairness, responsibility, and an unwavering commitment to the greater good.
